Is Brahmi at Takshashila thought to be derived from Aramaic?

Yes, the most widely accepted theory among mainstream scholars is that the Brahmi script was derived from or heavily influenced by Aramaic or other Semitic scripts. Aramaic was the bureaucratic language of the Achaemenid Empire, which controlled the northwest of the Indian subcontinent, including the region of Takshashila, from before 500 BCE.

see Esther 1:1

Takshashila was a major hub where Aramaic inscriptions have been found, including one potentially referencing the Mauryan emperor Ashoka's title "Priyadarshi".

Key points of the theory:

Alternative Theories:

While the Aramaic origin is the leading candidate, it remains a subject of debate. Other theories, often proposed by non-specialists, suggest:

The lack of archeological evidence for writing in the millennium between the Indus Valley Civilization's decline and the sudden appearance of fully developed Brahmi in Ashoka's time is the main obstacle to the indigenous origin theory.

** End of Page